Reputation and distinctiveness of opponent's mark not relevant to assessment of similarity
- William Kanaan
- Jun 12, 2020
- 1 min read
The ECJ has annulled the General Court's decision that an opposition to the registration of a figurative mark, based on an earlier EU trade mark, was well founded.
When identifying the dominant element of the earlier mark, EUIPO and the General Court had taken into account the reputation and degree of distinctive characters of that mark.
The ECJ said this test was relevant when assessing the likelihood of confusion but it was not relevant to the step that must first be taken of comparing marks to determine their similarity.
The ECJ went on to rule that the EUIPO had not properly identified the services in respect of which it had to examine the distinctive character of the earlier mark.
Recent Posts
See AllCompanies House has published guidance on how to protect personal information on the register of overseas entities from the public....
On Monday 10th February 2024, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pausing the United States Department of Justice from...
Despite submissions that it had stood for 135 years and had been approved by both the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, the High Court...
Comments